In less than six hours from the time I type this, if Congress cannot get its act together (which at this point is seeming certain), the goverment will go into shutdown. What do you think will happen next, both immediately and over the next few election cycles? Do you think the GOP will have the cojones to force default?
In brief, get ready for doom.
The Republicans apparently didn’t watch Saturday morning cartoons, so they never saw Schoolhouse Rock and never learned how a bill gets passed. So they’ve had the crazy idea that whatever they pass in the House will somehow become law— thus the 40 motions to repeal Obamacare. And then, because they can never get crazy enough, they got it into their heads that the Senate and Obama would go along with an attempt to get rid of Obamacare— after they lost the election and lost the Supreme Court case.
The shutdown, stupid and nasty and wasteful as it is, is nothing to the next bit: defaulting on the debt, which comes in about two weeks. Again, they’ve convinced themselves that they have leverage— that they can get Obama to enact Mitt Romney’s entire agenda, and more, in return for… nothing.
The thing is, when you ask for the moon, you have to be willing to provide something in return. And “not kill the economy” is not providing something. Defaulting on the US government’s obligations would be a suicidal move that would bring back another recession, or worse. Needless to say, it doesn’t bring about the beautiful libertarian dystopia they dream of. It doesn’t even get rid of Obamacare— that’s classified as an entitlement, like Social Security, which is why it’s continuing now during the shutdown.
For five years, anytime they’ve actually wanted to negotiate, Obama’s office door has been open. Too open, really. But to negotiate you have to be willing to give the other side some of what it wants, and for five years they’ve thought that they could skip this part.
The grand thing is, the base actually seems eager for a default. They think it’ll be fine! After all, “raising the debt ceiling” sounds like a bad thing— voters don’t really understand it, so many of them are against it, though they might not agree if you asked them directly “Should the executive branch refuse to spend the money Congress told it to?”
In 2011 Obama was eager for a long-term deficit-reducing deal, so he stupidly made some concessions on the debt ceiling thing. That only emboldens the GOP now. Obama seems to have wised up; he says he won’t offer any concessions in return for Congress doing its job. And he has said, correctly, that if he gives in on this, it’s the end of majority government in this country. They’d just increase their demands with each debt crisis. And why would a future Democratic House play nice with a future Republican president?
So, will they do it? I’m afraid they will. They’re revolutionaries and nihilists; they don’t care what happens. No one they care about is telling them not to do it.
The problem is, they have no exit strategy. Boehner is terrified of losing his job, so he went along with a plan he knew wouldn’t work. The Tea Party has worked itself into such a lather that it’s not going to go quickly to any sort of reasonable solution.
Normally at this point, you’d expect the grownups to step in and tell them to cool it. But they’ve spent the last twenty years throwing out the grownups— there’s a moderate caucus, but it hasn’t even got the 25 votes required to get a vote on the Senate bill. The more moderate national figures like McCain and Romney, who think the defunding moves are a terrible idea, have no influence on the House.
The money guys— Wall Street, the 1%— is going to get terrified at some point. Most of them are not crazed Tea Partiers— they don’t want to trash the government or destroy its credit rating. But they have very little leverage with the Tea Party either. If they lean on anyone, it’ll be John Boehner— and Boehner can’t control his own party.
Now, the last few crises have ended with a deal at, or a few days after, the deadline. So the most likely case is that around Oct. 20, a deal come through that keeps spending levels about where they are, funds Obamacare, raises the debt ceiling, and contains some kind of sweetener so Boehner can claim victory.
At any point Boehner could end the crisis by allowing a vote on the Senate bill. But he’d face a Tea Party revolt, so he’s not going to put his job on the line for a continuing resolution. For a deal that punts the problem for another year, maybe.
The worse case, and a series of steadily worsening cases, is that it takes the House a couple months after shutdown and default to realize that they’re not getting anything, and then they make a deal.
The Democrats, of course, are betting that the country will (very rightly) blame the GOP for the crisis, and for any pain that results. So far they’ve been very firm; it’s the GOP that’s showing itself full of holes.
Andrew Sullivan’s blog, the Dish, is good for getting a handle on what all the pundits are saying. Crazier scenarios than the ones I’ve outlined are possible, and no one knows what will happen, except that it’ll be bad.
In the long term, as I’ve said before, demographics are against the GOP… to mention just one state, Texas may well go back to the Democratic column within ten years. Relying exclusively on old white rural straight Christian non-Northerners is a losing strategy, if not in 2016, definitely in 2026.
The problem is, again, the craziness has no exit strategy. There is no mechanism for moderation in the party— quite the reverse, the primary system (and the very well-organized grassroots) keeps dragging the party more to the right. The public and the media may be pissed at the House Republicans right now— but their districts aren’t rebelling.
Juan Linz, who died yesterday, was a political theorist who mostly studied Latin America; his major thesis was that presidential systems just don’t work as well as parliamentary systems— because they have multiple concentrations of power each with electoral legitimacy, and there is no way to end the standoff. For years the major challenge to his theory was the two-century history of the US. It’s beginning to look like Linz was right after all. He suggested that the US avoided the trap because its parties were broad coalitions, too loose to create real gridlock. Well, the GOP has spent thirty years becoming an ideological monolith dedicated to opposing the Democrats at all costs. So the worst case is, the GOP causes a depression and forces a collapse of the American governmental system.
Have a good day!